🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an celebration that began as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate events where individuals of African heritage are compensated to talk to predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Éire and the Holland.

The month has developed since those days, giving reduced attention to the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and more on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the observance is commemorated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the United Kingdom, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the summer we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a legislator gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a source of worry. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the state. A effort to remove African American heritage and experience from the archives is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration represents how minimally it can be impactful if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized festivities of historical achievements, rather than confronting the conditions of the present. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is needed. An academic expert, a prof at an educational institution, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The problem with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just discontinue events including Black History Month completely, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an foundation that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as various establishments are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not avoid politics, and provides room for citizens, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is mere awareness of the past when it fails to address the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who mark it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and awareness of minor insults, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and reactive. It could be that an total re-identification is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.