🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate nuclear talks with the United States provided that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had come from go-betweens to reopen discussions with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to access bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Walking a Complex Path

The foreign minister is treading a difficult course since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be operating from a position of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more resilient in military terms and mentally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Negotiations Abruptly Ended

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that ended with the US president declaring the facilities had been destroyed. Afterward, Western states used their privilege to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with US participation could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats claimed three times they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the agreement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Current Situation

Tehran representatives stated the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the offer could be revived in certain ways if talks restart.

Trump in recent days claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to restart talks, but confidentially Iranian officials say they are not yet getting coherent offers from the United States either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been charged of inactivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran states negotiations is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Stance

In his address to the forum, aimed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of international law, Araghchi said the two-week conflict showed the conflict could not be settled by military means. He said the assaults commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with full US knowledge and cooperation, making trust hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Final Answer

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the Western nations that had always tried to enforce their desires during the talks. Negotiations can still be active and stays the ultimate answer to resolve conflicts, but its requirements, regulations and tenets must be followed."

"In case they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and honor, they will obtain a answer in the equivalent tone."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the battle of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister said he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We acquired multiple understandings from this war; we have come to know our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He added: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the determination of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The Iranian people have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the leadership and the nation in the face of this attack."