🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear he endured a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, squandering some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to dance. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, like many a top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship 1994-95 season, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for failing in one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this whole bruising episode appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual who owed his position as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s true generals: a strategic mind of which United’s mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Conflict Regarding Formation & Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the hierarchy that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties were resisted. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when delivered from the mouth with the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not the same as being ready to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Authority In the Throne

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the commands of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his preference for a back four. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style of play “shall be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his previous experience in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply better. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

The Modern Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Perhaps it was once feasible for an up-and-coming, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into a club and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many businesses have such individuals established? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Better by far to place the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the product, yet finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into Europe and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while the people who hired him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Responsibility Only for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this represents corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for using excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and then discard him for taking excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.